<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Add-in Express for Office &#8211; Generation 2010 roadmap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/</link>
	<description>All about developing COM add-ins, smart tags and RTD servers in Visual Studio .NET, VSTO and Delphi + Add-in Express</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

That&#039;s excellent news! 

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s excellent news! </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Starostin</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9329</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Starostin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9329</guid>
		<description>Aaron,

We will publish our regions (ADXOlFormsManager) redesigned for Office 2010 in beta 1. In general, beta 1 will include complete functionality compatible with all Office 2010 features. Have a look at http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/03/05/visual-studio-2010-office2010/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>We will publish our regions (ADXOlFormsManager) redesigned for Office 2010 in beta 1. In general, beta 1 will include complete functionality compatible with all Office 2010 features. Have a look at <a href="http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/03/05/visual-studio-2010-office2010/" rel="nofollow">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/03/05/visual-studio-2010-office2010/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9326</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9326</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

That is all good news. I&#039;m a bit unclear on where the bits we really need to test as soon as possible some into the schedule. We make use of AddinExpress.OL.ADXOlFormsManager and in particular ADXOlFormsCollectionItems to render some custom panes in Outlook for aour application. This is actually the only functionality that does not work fine right now in Outlook 2010. Where does that fit into the release schedule? Will it be available in the Beta 1 or Beta 2 or does that fall into &quot;New Outlook regions designer&quot; which is scheduled for the final release?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>That is all good news. I&#8217;m a bit unclear on where the bits we really need to test as soon as possible some into the schedule. We make use of AddinExpress.OL.ADXOlFormsManager and in particular ADXOlFormsCollectionItems to render some custom panes in Outlook for aour application. This is actually the only functionality that does not work fine right now in Outlook 2010. Where does that fit into the release schedule? Will it be available in the Beta 1 or Beta 2 or does that fall into &#8220;New Outlook regions designer&#8221; which is scheduled for the final release?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Starostin</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9321</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Starostin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9321</guid>
		<description>Aaron,

&gt; Now that Microsoft has announced RTM in May will you be bringing forward the plans you currently have in place for 2010 releases?

Yes, of course.


&gt; Also, will premium customers have access to early beta’s or code which can be used to verify current applications will run on 2010 as expected (obviously without support from you guys!)?

Yes, of course. Beta 1, beta 2 and builds at your request will be available for all our premium and professional subscribers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron,</p>
<p>> Now that Microsoft has announced RTM in May will you be bringing forward the plans you currently have in place for 2010 releases?</p>
<p>Yes, of course.</p>
<p>> Also, will premium customers have access to early beta’s or code which can be used to verify current applications will run on 2010 as expected (obviously without support from you guys!)?</p>
<p>Yes, of course. Beta 1, beta 2 and builds at your request will be available for all our premium and professional subscribers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9320</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9320</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Now that Microsoft has announced RTM in May will you be bringing forward the plans you currently have in place for 2010 releases? Also, will premium customers have access to early beta&#039;s or code which can be used to verify current applications will run on 2010 as expected (obviously without support from you guys!)?

http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2010/03/05/sharepoint-2010-office-2010-launch.aspx 

Thanks,

Aaron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Now that Microsoft has announced RTM in May will you be bringing forward the plans you currently have in place for 2010 releases? Also, will premium customers have access to early beta&#8217;s or code which can be used to verify current applications will run on 2010 as expected (obviously without support from you guys!)?</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2010/03/05/sharepoint-2010-office-2010-launch.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/sharepoint/archive/2010/03/05/sharepoint-2010-office-2010-launch.aspx</a> </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Aaron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Giesen</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9310</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Giesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9310</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

yuck! OK, point taken. I see what you mean now. No compiler-internal support for IDispatch is bad news indeed.
I had repressed how much of the COM-plexities of OLE Delphi is hiding from us...

Renders Dmitry&#039;s effort all the more herculean, I guess...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>yuck! OK, point taken. I see what you mean now. No compiler-internal support for IDispatch is bad news indeed.<br />
I had repressed how much of the COM-plexities of OLE Delphi is hiding from us&#8230;</p>
<p>Renders Dmitry&#8217;s effort all the more herculean, I guess&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Starostin</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9308</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Starostin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9308</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

Have a look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://lazarus.firmos.at/index.php?topic=7213.15&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; (see the last post).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>Have a look at <a href="http://lazarus.firmos.at/index.php?topic=7213.15" rel="nofollow">this post</a> (see the last post).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Giesen</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9305</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Giesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9305</guid>
		<description>No, I think you misunderstood me. I was more thinking about adding a couple of ifdef&#039;s here and there (understatement anyone? ;) ) so you could *compile* ADX-based projects with the 64bit FreePascal-compiler but still do the development using the 32bit Delphi IDE. As far as I understood FreePascal is pretty much on par with Delphi&#039;s compiler (or even better in some areas). No sign of low-level C-style development as far as I can tell (unless you just wrote that to refer to the comparative lack of sophisticated designtime tools) 

As I wrote, I have no first-hand experience with FreePascal/Lazarus at all so far so I don&#039;t know how complete/compatible their RTL/VCL-replacement is. I keep hearing that they&#039;re coming pretty close though and if it&#039;s good enough for Dmitry to let him produce both 32bit (in Delphi) and 64bit (in FreePascal) versions of Redemption from a single code base (I very much doubt he started from scratch for the 64bit version) that must be pretty good already.

I was just asking whether you (or anyone else) had already tried or considered this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I think you misunderstood me. I was more thinking about adding a couple of ifdef&#8217;s here and there (understatement anyone? ;) ) so you could *compile* ADX-based projects with the 64bit FreePascal-compiler but still do the development using the 32bit Delphi IDE. As far as I understood FreePascal is pretty much on par with Delphi&#8217;s compiler (or even better in some areas). No sign of low-level C-style development as far as I can tell (unless you just wrote that to refer to the comparative lack of sophisticated designtime tools) </p>
<p>As I wrote, I have no first-hand experience with FreePascal/Lazarus at all so far so I don&#8217;t know how complete/compatible their RTL/VCL-replacement is. I keep hearing that they&#8217;re coming pretty close though and if it&#8217;s good enough for Dmitry to let him produce both 32bit (in Delphi) and 64bit (in FreePascal) versions of Redemption from a single code base (I very much doubt he started from scratch for the 64bit version) that must be pretty good already.</p>
<p>I was just asking whether you (or anyone else) had already tried or considered this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Starostin</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9302</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Starostin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9302</guid>
		<description>Oliver,

We could definitely port our Add-in Express to FreePascal, but... hardly any of our customers would agree to automate Office in a low-level C-style. You do not suggest that we create FreePascal-wrappers over all Office apps, do you? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver,</p>
<p>We could definitely port our Add-in Express to FreePascal, but&#8230; hardly any of our customers would agree to automate Office in a low-level C-style. You do not suggest that we create FreePascal-wrappers over all Office apps, do you? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Giesen</title>
		<link>http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/2010/02/05/office-2010-roadmap/comment-page-1/#comment-9299</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Giesen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.add-in-express.com/creating-addins-blog/?p=1066#comment-9299</guid>
		<description>Eugene,

Dmitry recently announced that there will soon be a 64bit-version of Redemption which he produces using FreePascal. I haven&#039;t looked at Lazarus or FreePascal myself yet but do you think it would be possible to use that as a temp solution for producing 64bit ADX-based addins until Embarcadero get their stuff together? Surely not the designtime stuff but maybe the projects can at least be made to compile?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eugene,</p>
<p>Dmitry recently announced that there will soon be a 64bit-version of Redemption which he produces using FreePascal. I haven&#8217;t looked at Lazarus or FreePascal myself yet but do you think it would be possible to use that as a temp solution for producing 64bit ADX-based addins until Embarcadero get their stuff together? Surely not the designtime stuff but maybe the projects can at least be made to compile?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

